Pfizer. Always seemed like a good swear word to me.
Contra Geert Vanden Bossche — who I wrote about a few weeks ago — Dr. Michael Yeadon (pictured above), a former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, sees no possibility of the much-talked-about but not well-understood possibility of “immune escape” in the current pandemic and subsequent mass vaccination response. Yet he notes that all the talk of “variants” by official experts amounts to the same, and this is worrisome.
Suspicious. In the extreme.
And is only one of the lies being told to us.
By folks in government.
And the press.
But here is Dr. Yeadon:
[I]n the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything. It’s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don’t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.
Or, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some ‘top-up’ vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants.
Everything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong.
“EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death,” by Christina Valenzuela, April 18, 2021.
So of course his mind clicks to a possible explanation: an induced mass depopulation event.
My mind went there, too. Is he right? Is this suspicion on target?
I do not know. But when I read mainstream take-downs on Yeadon, like the one by Reuters, I am not inclined to think he is completely off base. There is a lot of assertion and counter-assertion in such take-downs, but no real arguments against his position.
The Reuters piece would be more convincing if it actually dealt with Yeadon’s main contentions, helpfully listed by Christina Valenzuela:
Arguing against his actual positions might be convincing. But the criticisms of Yeadon I have seen so far strike me as ranging from clever propaganda to sub-intellectual journalistic garbage.
twv
A very great problem with the plausibility of a theory that the vaccines are designed to kill the vaccinated is that a much greater share of survivors than of the present population would be people inclined to resist authority and to attribute any die-back to the vaccinations.
Yeah. This may be why Vanden Bossche suspect immune escape: the design would be to kill those who don’t take the treatment.
Of course, no plan seems most likely.
Also, “vaccine passport” could be the end in itself. No need for depopulation. Just the power.
But sterilizing most of humanity is quite an issue, and the troubles with the vaccine for pregnant women are worth thinking about.