Archives for category: Conspiracy

Dinesh D’Souza has a new documentary out called 2000 Mules. It alleges to prove what many of us has suspected: massive vote fraud in the 2020 election by the Democrats.

It must surely be watched.

Those of us who suspected massive vote fraud had a number of reasons, the most obvious being: a tight cadre of leftists in America who believed that TRUMP IS HITLER allowed this belief to justify illegality in voting to secure “Hitler’s” overthrow. After all, TRUMP’S HITLER! The motive? Obvious; the excuse was lying there on the surface. The opportunity? Well, Americans’ unwillingness to talk rationally about election security meant that they probably could get away with it — and the lack of security in American voting systems has been well known for decades, and was exacerbated by the pandemic over-reaction. So of course the Democratic Party’s loose conspiracy of centrists leveraged gullible leftists’ belief to steal an election. To regain a latch on power.

And the vote counts were awfully suspicious. Tales abounded. But good data?

Well, a frustrating element of the case for election fraud quickly came to dominate all discussion of the election. Immediately, the Consensus threw its weight around . . . to throw out evidence and not consider reasonable cases on grounds that always seemed, to me, quite suspicious themselves. Over and over this scenario played out: A plausible case is put forward for election fraud in a voting district or at a ballot counting center only to immediately be said not to be definitive, and thus not worth further investigation — or even much reported upon.

The demand was always for hard proof, but the method of consideration appeared, to me, always to deny that such proof could be found, so not worth pushing.

A loftily high standard was allowed to strangle each investigation at or before birth.

The case for Democratic electoral fraud was regarded as by definition Trumpian and therefore Evil.

And it sure looks like hard proof, which is, indeed, what we want, was precisely what was being prevented from being presented.

But hard proof looks like what D’Souza is showing in his movie. It behooves us to watch it.

Seek it out:

Indeed, we should watch it despite the fact that D’Souza used numerals instead of spelling out the number in his title, as would be proper. When you start a sentence with a number, spell it out. That’s the rule: no numerals in such cases. And this applies to titles, too. After all, it is, technically, Nineteen Eighty-Four as the title of Orwell’s novel (see the original publication), not 1984.

Apt example, since it is Democrats who are hell-bent on setting up a 1984-ish political order — in no small part because they’ve allowed themselves to be programmed by CIA-controlled news media propagandists. And a stolen election is a “good start.”

twv

As my friends know, one of my favorite conspiracy conjectures — which I lovingly bring up at awkward social moments, to fondle intellectually and perhaps too publicly — is that [some of] the elites in the Deep State and the Davos crowd know that a huge natural holocaust is coming, that it would likely destroy the bulk of civilization, and that it would be a mercy to kill off vast swaths of humanity more slowly, prior to that chaotic event.

How? Say through a planned rollout of pseudo-vaccines that make us weaker and prone to spread-out deaths via bloodclots, autoimmune disease, and the like.

And what would this natural holocaust be? A surge of solar energy is the most likely candidate. Knowledge of a cyclical recurrence of comet hits might suggest the same strategy.

This is not just outrageous speculation. Terrestrial hits of solar bursts are unpredictable but not uncommon on a long time-line. Evidence for them is accumulating — they are not just limited to the infamous Carrington Event of 1859. A recent article at Astronomy.com relates evidence of a massive solar storm many thousands of years ago, as the pre-pottery neolithic (PPN) was reaching a tipping point in accumulating capital — something perhaps necessary for civilization to take off. The article’s blurb: “An analysis of radioactive chemicals in ice cores indicates one of the most powerful solar storms ever hit Earth around 7176 B.C.” The article links to a scholarly paper published in January, “Cosmogenic radionuclides reveal an extreme solar particle storm near a solar minimum 9125 years BP.” It is fascinating.

Other extraterrestrial events are being studied and categorized as well — I’ve mentioned the Holocene Impact Working Group before. In the paper “A Tunguska sized airburst destroyed Tall el-Hammam a Middle Bronze Age city in the Jordan Valley near the Dead Sea,” the truth about Sodom and Gomorrah came out last year: a bolide event destroyed a city near the Dead Sea c. 1650 BC. This fits the Biblical timeline. More important is evidence of massive destruction at the Abu Hureyra site in Syria: this event c. 10,800 BC. This fits the Younger Dryas timeline, and is a few thousand years earlier than the PPN.

And note: isn’t it interesting that the eruption of Thera/Santorini happened within a century of the destruction of Sodom/Gomorrah? Ralph Ellis’s contention that the Santorini event corresponds to the first Exodus, arguing that the “parting of the Red Sea” describes classic tsunami behavior, and that the historical record of the event can be found on a well-known stela in Egypt, hidden in plain sight.

But back to my conjecture about our elites: Arguably, it’s not “mercy” alone that would have the elites kill off the “superfluous” populations. The chaos of mass death on a multi-billion population planet might preclude the elites from reaching their bunkers in time to wear out the maelstrom. But had the population already been radically reduced in number and spirit over years of death and anguish and sorrow — from, say, iatrogenic effects of the recent pandemic — then maybe the elites could make their getaways.

What I am suggesting is that the celestial coup de grâce (solar surge; comet hit; what-have-you) might make for less civilizational destruction — fewer riots, mostly — allowing for the rich folks (Hollywood moguls, tech company heads, politicians, billionaires, scientists, a few athletes — insert Dr. Strangelove arguments here) to make their escape into the underground bunkers.

The elites are contemplating a new Ark. What with the military’s vast empires of underground installations already in place, the Ark, I hazard, has already been made, and the plan is in place. And folks like Fauci and Schwab and Gates and others are likely in on it.

I of course merely speculate; I know nothing. But for us science fiction readers, well: some of us assume that when we imagine possibilities, well-funded people make plans.

twv

Looking westwards towards the Sun, on the Pacific.

A conspiracy is a group of people working in secret to commit a crime.

But is an attempt to change the rules to redefine what a crime is itself a crime? And would a secret attempt, then, be a conspiracy?

Hold on . . .

Right now, the biggest political movement underway is “Build Back Better” or “The Great Reset.” It is an attempt to revise society from the top down in nearly every domain of life. It has been closely associated with the “climate justice” movement because climate alarmists think everything must be changed to “save the planet,” though their data and reasoning do not strike me as very good at all. Those who hold these beliefs are much exasperated by the sheer fact that most Americans do not regard climate as the even in the Top Ten of reasonable political priorities. But there is hope for the radicals on this issue, for whom democracy is getting in the way of political action: in the last two years a much better way of instituting radical reforms (political revolution from the top) has been found: the pandemic. Making us all wear masks, deciding who can work and where, forcing people to take experimental therapeutics and calling them “vaccines” — these are all beyond merely radical. They are quite tyrannical controls, and are part of The Great Reset.

I consider it all quite criminal — and in America, the pressure government and politicians have placed upon social media platforms constitutes a clear violation of the First Amendment, and is thus unconstitutional and (in the old, broad sense) un-American.

But is it a conspiracy?

Well, it’s been out in the open. So: no.

But then notice something: the people who have brought up the alarm about this “open” policy advocacy and planning have repeatedly been called “conspiracy theorists.” And, therefore, are regarded commonly as fringe, as nutty. Examples include Glenn Beck (with a new book out on the subject, I hear) and the indefatigable Alex Jones.

This calumny marginalizes opposition to the policy (The Great Reset), insulating it from criticism — or even open discussion. It means that people generally can ignore the process of fascification.*

So, I’d call the Davos-devised, globalist Great Reset a “quasi-conspiracy.” Its openness is obscured by psy-op. Thus the elites and academics who have been pushing it are, indeed, quasi-conspirators.

twv

Novel Terms:

To fascify is to unite people politically in an alarmingly totalitarian manner, “to make fascistic.”

A quasi-conspiracy is a public effort to change the scope and definition of crime or government that is protected from public criticism by accusing the effort’s critics of being “conspiracy theorists” — gaining the secretive element of a conspiracy by the psychological operation of accusation of “conspiracy theory.”

While these are my coinages, quick searches of the Internet show previous uses. Uses of the former term are close to my definition, above, while previous uses of the latter are less interesting than mine, for my specific use has, shall we say, a special character.

Michael Yeadon has speculated that the simultaneous abandonment by the major nation states around the world of established pandemic protocols for policies of mandatory mask wearing by the public, lockdowns and lockouts of commerce and general sociality, and then the pushing on the whole of the public a handful of experimental ”vaccination” treatments during a pandemic, requires special, coordinated action and agency. Extraordinary evidence demands extraordinary explanation. Conspiracy was what he came up with, though he was not privy to the insider information that would allow him to point to the culprits — of whom the conspiracy might consist.

If that be a reasonable extrapolation, then the mind lurches to motive.

Given the opportunity of insider players like Antony Fauci and Peter Daszak and a manure-spreader full of other bureaucrats and politicians and science-technicians on the make, a financial motive must be considered. But the mind reels. Could this really be ”all about” the moolah? Surely power lust and the insiders’ itch for a Great Reset to a new technocratic totalitarianism is the driving passion!

But maybe it really is all — or mostly, or (crucially) effectively — a plunder scheme, a public fraud for pecuniary reasons. And this low-down dirty element has risen to public attention. Now. It is happening first Down Under.

I almost never quote other people’s blog posts whole. But I feel a need to call attention to a news development of great significance, and one way to do that is to mirror others’ work here. This story is huge in its implications.

October 2, 2021:

Former Australian Member of Parliament Says Pfizer and AstraZeneca Paid Lobbyists to Direct Australia’s Leaders to Push Vaccine Mandates

By Cristina Laila 
Published October 2, 2021 at 9:06pm

A former Australian member of Parliament came out and said Pfizer and AstraZeneca are paying lobbyists to direct Australia’s leaders to push vaccine mandates.

Clive Palmer, leader of the United Australia Party claimed ousted New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian was told she wouldn’t be charged in a corruption probe if she imposed a vaccine mandate.

Palmer made these statements a couple weeks ago but it has garnered a lot of attention this weekend after Berejiklian resigned in disgrace following a corruption probe.

Two weeks ago, Palmer said Pfizer and AstraZeneca were paying lobbyists tens of millions of dollars to direct Australia’s liberal leaders to push the double jab.

According to Palmer, Berejiklian, who was under a corruption probe by the ICAC at the time, was told if she imposed strict lockdowns and vaccine mandates, she wouldn’t be charged.

Shortly before Berejiklian resigned, she told Sydney residents that if they don’t take the Covid jab, they face total social isolation indefinitely after the stay-at-home order ends in December.

Berejiklian made history for overseeing one of the most fascistic regimes in modern history like nothing we have witnessed in the Western world.

It appears she was bowing to Big Pharma lobbyists and special interest groups once again proving Covid mandates have NOTHING to do with science or saving lives.

Clive Palmer told reporters of Berejiklian: “The only way she gets out of the inquiry is if she pushes the double jab.”

A lefty reporter pushed back on Clive Palmer: “You think the premier of New South Wales is trying to destroy businesses?”

“I do,” Palmer replied. “She’s being directed by lobbyists in Sydney, who is being paid by AstraZeneca and by Pfizer tens of millions of dollars to get these policies through, to make sure the vaccines get pushed…that’s my personal knowledge and I’m happy to make a statement here, to police, to anyone.”

The Gateway Pundit, October 2, 2021.

October 4, 2021:

Domino Effect: New South Wales Sinks Into Political Disarray and Chaos After Six Officials Including its Premier and Deputy Premier Exit

A total of six officials have resigned in the span of three days following tyrannical New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s difficult resignation on Friday.  Berjiklian announced her ‘difficult decision’ to resign after a corruption watchdog announced it was looking into her ‘alleged misconduct.’  It was the corruption charges that finally brought the tyrannical leader to step down.

Following NSW Premier Berejiklian’s exit, her Deputy Premier John Barilaro also announced his resignation and will leave parliament. Barilaro said the constant pressure from media scrutiny and his defamation case against YouTuber Jordan Shanks is a ‘big reason’ for his departure from politics.

YouTube star Jordan Shanks responded to Barilaro’s departure and attacks.  Barilaro accused the YouTube star of “vile racism” after Shanks called him ‘a conman to the core, powered by spaghetti.’  “FriendlyJordies” accused Barilaro of using his press conference to smear him as racist.

News.com reported:

New South Wales is in a state of political disarray and chaos, facing multiple costly and distracting by-elections and an uncertain path towards post-Covid freedom.

In the space of three days, NSW has lost its Premier and Deputy Premier, a senior Cabinet Minister, three veteran Coalition members of parliament and will likely need to find a new Treasurer in coming weeks.

The shock resignation on Friday of Premier Gladys Berejiklian, both from the state’s top job and parliament representing the seat of Willoughby, has sparked a domino effect of departures.

Following her today is Deputy Premier John Barilaro, who announced he’s stepping aside from the role as well as quitting as Nationals leader and exiting politics, leaving vacant his regional seat of Monaro.

And on Sunday, Transport Minister Andrew Constance confirmed he would leave the NSW Cabinet and quite state politics for a tilt at a federal seat.

Those three departures will each require a by-election.

Speculation is mounting that more departures from the Coalition ranks could come within days.

Now, just a week away from the end of Sydney’s lockdown and the beginning of a new era in the coronavirus pandemic – one the rest of the country is closely watching – the focus is firmly on the government’s internal woes instead.

Apparently, the judicial system still works in Australia.

The Gateway Pundit, October 4, 2021.

October 4, 2021:

Ok, We’ll Ask The Question, If New South Wales PM Resigned For Pushing VAX With Millions From Pfizer, What About Old Joe?

by L Todd Wood October 4, 2021

We Already Know Biden Crime Family Takes Bribes…Just Read Hunter’s Laptop

Please Follow us on GabMindsTelegramRumbleGab TVGETTR

This morning saw six more politicians on the staff of former New South Wales, Australia Premier Gladys Berejiklian resign over corruption allegations. The crux of the issue is that Berejiklian has reportedly been taking tens of millions of dollars for pushing the big Pharma vaccines on the Australian people, locking them down, and destroying lives and businesses. 

A former Australian member of Parliament came out and said Pfizer and AstraZeneca are paying lobbyists to direct Australia’s leaders to push vaccine mandatesreported The Gateway Pundit.

Clive Palmer, leader of the United Australia Party claimed ousted New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian was told she wouldn’t be charged in a corruption probe if she imposed a vaccine mandate.

We at CDMedia believe we are at just the beginning of further revelations of politicians across the globe taking bribes for acting in big pharama’s interest at the expense of their citizens, even to the point of murder. These actions were taken in conjunction with the globalist CCP virus information operation which also murdered millions, pushed by the Chinese Communist Party and enabled by collaborators in leadership positions in the West. Andrew Cuomo’s actions regarding nursing home deaths in NYC come to mind. 

CDMedia has been reporting on Biden Crime Family corruption since early 2019 in Ukraine, and then the revelations from the Hunter Biden laptop. That investigation showed in fine print Hunter and Joe taking billions from the CCP and 10% going to ‘the big guy’, and Hunter saying he has given his father half his earning for decades. The laptop showed the Biden Crime Family using State Department officials and FBI agents to pursue deals and bribes overseas. The Daily Mail reported much of this. 

Are we to believe that Old Joe has not also taken millions from big Pharma in order to push vaccines, and lockdowns on the American people?

Enquiring minds want to know. It’s a reasonable question.

CDMedia, October 4, 2021.

And then when you realize that Big Pharma is not just an outsider company bribing its way into the federal government’s inner sanctum, to make an extra-big ”killing” on the market — when you realize that Big Pharma is as closely tied to the federal regulatory apparatus as military contractors are to the Pentagon — then you may have stumbled on to the clue to the biggest swindle and power grab of the ”democratic” west.

It is not just bribes and graft and payoffs, at least not in America. The crime here is integral to the progressives’ beloved Administrative State.

So we can expect the center-left, at least, to fight these accusations hard. Not only are their fortunes at stake, so also are their ”sacred” [profane] honor, and — considering the torch-and-pitchfork potential — their very lives.

Not to mention their vision of ”social democracy.”

The far left will increasingly break away from this crowd, along the lines of thought leaders like Jimmy Dore and Glenn Greenwald. But what will the core grifter set do?

Find your pitchfork, and the pitch to keep torches burning, for if we do not hold all the grifters to account — and take the legal proceedings, perhaps, all the way to The Hague, for crimes against humanity — and make charges stick, it will merely embolden them.

And of our progressive friends? Do to them what they have done to individualists, and what must be done to progressive pols: Ridicule them; marginalize them. Tar them with the same brush as the insiders. For it is their ideas that have justified the institutions that have enabled this Crime of the Millennium. Now is no time for squeamishness. All these people must be humiliated and driven from political life, completely removed from power.

That, or this will all just fizzle.

twv

When confronting an unknown, it strikes me that a proper assessment must begin not merely by figuring out “the likeliest” suspect causes but also a much more complete list of the possible suspects.

One of the interesting things about a programmed society is that people reflexively know precisely what they must not even consider.

For example, when COVID broke out in China, we quickly learned that there were virology institutes there. So of course we should have considered, immediately, the possibility of not only gain-of-function research going on, but also its use as bioweaponry.

That is, a rational person would immediately know that an act of war may have occurred.

But fine, upstanding citizens in the west are so fearful of looking foolish, so fearful of a real war with real consequences at home, so phobic even about identifying anyone “outside” as a possible enemy (this is the leftist prejudice), that we all immediately feel the taboo against talking about these possibilities. Even I, who thought these thoughts immediately, hesitated to make much of them.

This is programming.

Whether said programming is the result of psychological warfare from the Chinazis, from the CIA, from the old Soviet legacy, or whether it is an invisible hand result of the memes themselves — the egregori of the noösphere — I don’t know. I suspect a little of each.

In any case, right now, there is the Delta variant and a few other strains of the ’rona percolating through society. As soon as we heard this, what did we think?

Well, the likeliest provenance?

1. Normal mutation of a virus. Zoonotic, that is the technical term few of us could remember before 2020.

But we should have considered two other possibilities, at least:

2. Immune escape from leaky vaccines (Geert Vanden Bossche’s warning) or perhaps even poorly implemented therapeutics; or

3. Just the latest wave of bioweaponry release by the CCP/globalist cadres to effect a political restructuring, giving it some breathing room to avoid calamity that they sit upon, nervously.

These more minatory possibilities should be considered for the same reason that the panicky folk insisted on theorizing about the death of many, many more millions of people: the precautionary principle.

But the thing is, when you consider all options in the face of an unknown, not just the one actually pushed (zoonotic origin and worldwide decimating plague), the policy response would be radically different.

How so? Well, from a war scenario perspective, what the world’s nations have done is surrender.

They have done so by crippling their productive capacity and sapping their will to fight. Instead of encouraging bravery, our rulers shepherded us like bleating sheep. And these sheep? They began mobbing for salvation, suppressing independent thinkers in the herd who might (horrors!) somehow jinx the shepherds’ plan to save us. The one thing no one considered was prepare for a fight. To become stronger not weaker. To become active not indolent. To become fearsome not fearful.

The thing is, actual courage would have made us all healthier.

Despair and lethargy need not have been the ineluctable social result of the new disease. I say that, even if — as appears now wildly unlikely — the disease proved of zoonotic origin, and that the death toll sans mitigation efforts would have been much larger, we would have wound up better off regardless. But I don’t believe either of those two iffy suppositions. I believe the evidence that has been accumulating — that this pandemic was the result of gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China — and I suspect that it may very well have been purposely leaked for political or strategic reasons. I also would bet (were a counterfactual gamble a live option) that a reaction of courage would have spurred us to do what we should have done immediately: engage in OPEN DISCUSSION of a wide variety of treatments, and thereby save millions of lives. Indeed, much of the death count of the last year and a half was preventable not by mitigation but by evidence-based medical treatments (accommodating some good-old-fashioned medical artistry). Sadly, the upshot of the frightened reaction has been massive destruction on multiple levels.

I chiefly blame Donald Trump, whose platforming of the man who funded the virus led to the general panic and to the vaxx-craze — his temptation appears to have been his pathetic, narcissistic need to play Savior.

We cannot really blame the Democrats, who surely capitalized on the leadership collapse, for they are ideological cultists, and cultists gonna cult. Their whole philosophy is servility and the promotion of a gimme-gimme culture, not a culture of courage. One shouldn’t blame them, exactly. One should scorn them as quisling fools. But Republicans have hardly been much better. It is the nature of the GOP to tag along behind the Democracy like the whining mutant crying “too fast! too fast!” but never effectively stopping the parade of decline.

Now, you might be wondering — hey, Republicans tend to be opposed to the lockdowns, why couldn’t they have led better?

Well, Republicans are not leaders. They are followers by nature. Their “leaders” have been heavily over-burdened with ignoramuses and fools. President “W,” Sarah Palin, and Donald Trump all showed amazing degrees of ignorance about the world, and all three push a down-homey simpleton intellectual stance. This sort of cultural preference does not encourage people to courageously think through a problem.

When faced with an unknown, as the pandemic was for the first year, at least, you have to look to more intellectual types.

But our intelligentsia has been almost wholly captured by the cult of the omnipotent state, and the wider smarties class has so convinced itself of its self-groomed status as “the wise” that nearly the whole lot of them has become a herd of fools.

This much we know.

twv

N. B. I am not saying that the bioweaponry possibility is likely. I do not believe the conjecture. But I have explained before why it is not “stupid,” why it is not “tinfoil hat,” as has been asserted. Smart people lay on this predictable anti-conspiracy chatter — most especially trotting out the related notion, the tired cliché that “big conspiracies are too difficult to keep secret” — because they do not research how psychological operations by disinformation artists actually work. That being said, recent reports about a Chinese plan to take their research to infect bats with an agent to prevent a zoonotic upgrade to a human-infecting strain suggests that the Chinese may be innocent. But that does not exonerate a possible (but still not likely) globalist sabotage to leak the virus. In the face of unknowns, one should be humble enough not to throw out dismissive theories unbacked by study. It is better to advance conjectures requiring further study.

What we know, pretty much for sure:

1. Fauci funded Daszak to create SARS-CoV-2 via gain-of-function research ostensibly to develop a robust mRNA vaccine in case of a zoonotic outbreak — but the carelessness or evil of folks on the ground at the Wuhan Institute for Virology (the Chinese who circuitously received U.S. tax funds) means that an iatrogenic leak preëmpted the “expected” breakout and “necessitated” a hasty and under-studied deployment of said treatments.

2. Democrats — from at least the Bill Clinton Administration on — have had tight, and quite suspicious, relationships with the “communists” in China.

Joe Biden’s son and brother received millions for their . . . influence peddling . .. from Chinese “businesses.” Biden was anti-Russia and pro-China as a campaign strategy. Democrats generally lambasted Trump for his half-quarantining travel embargo on China (early 2020) and for calling the new pathogen “the China virus,” saying it was “racist”to do so — even after they had been parlaying hatred and distrust, dangerously, at “Russia” for four years, on trumped-up (excuse me) evidence, now quite clear in the Mueller Report and later investigations.

What we must, therefore,* speculate:

3. Insiders in and around the Democratic Party and within the Administrative State (both Deep and Wide) have been working for decades to shift American power to China, in a great baton hand-off of imperialist power (let’s call it “The Mandate of Heaven”), just as British liberals and bankers did to America in the first half of the 20th century. Their reaction to the pandemic has fit in with this agenda, though most stumbled into it by Invisible Hand influences.

I think this is a pretty good surmise. It may not be true. I think it probably is, but am willing to drop it if falsified.

But the Democrats’ general preference for the Chinese commies is quite clear, and despicable. Further, the corruption of the Clintons was clear in the 1990s, just as the corruption of the Bidens is clear today.

Since the 1990s, to repeat, America’s globalist role has been deprecated in favor of China’s reëmergence. By whom? Name the suspects. Whoever; whomever. In any case, even our generals need to signal their willingness to go along with this transfer of power, hence the alleged call of General Milley to his counterpart in the Celestial Kingdom. These American leaders have to jockey for survival even as they negotiate the greatest power hand-off of all time.

What the precise machinations are I’ve barely a clue. But the American nation state is bankrupt financially and culturally — it is pretty much over.

The key drivers behind all this may be a tad more mundane than a conspiracy, I do not doubt:

  1. Big Pharma profits;
  2. Groupthink on a grand scale, a lemming stampede based on fear and disinformation
  3. The statist presumption of salvation by State intervention;
  4. Trump Derangement Syndrome and all the ideological baggage that entailed;
  5. The leftist assumption that ”we” (westerners; Americans) are bad and ”they” (whatever the Other of the Day may be) are innocent, victims of ”our” oppression;
  6. Media and political gains from dividing people against each other;
  7. A complete lack of leadership to marshal courage in Americans, whose experience is key worldwide;
  8. Civilizational Death Wish?!?!

But these underlying forces, which sure seem operative everywhere these days, do not explain everything. The existence of international elites as well as partisan American elites cannot be doubted, but their exact agenda? How coordinated is it? I suspect that there has been coordination at key moments all through the pandemic. But hey! Can all this be proven?

Well, not when evidence is deliberately lied about and suppressed, and dissidents de-platformed. And not, especially, while thought leaders continually accept stonewalling evasion as dissuasive of guilt, when it should be regarded as indicative of same. We have to accept common standards of evidence to prove something, and American politics has abandoned any shared standard of evidence since at least Reagan’s time, when GHWB and friends engaged in Iran-Contra.

twv

* The imperative, here, lies in the Precautionary Principle, if applied in ways not accepted by those who usually try to implement it.

“Overuse of vaccines will drive the development of viruses that are able to evade vaccination.”

“The people that will suffer from this naïve, inappropriate policy of global universal forced vaccination when the potent virus escaped mutants develop will be those people at high risk, the people who most need the vaccine.”

Malone appearing on Jimmy Dore’s show.

Dr. Robert Malone, initial developer of the mRNA vaccine technology, basically (but not explicitly) backing up Geert Vanden Bossche’s fear of massive immune escape driven by universal vaccination with a limited-utility vaccine.

He goes on to say that he believes this technology can be good, but only if targeted at specific populations. Previously, he had noted that forced universal vaccination goes against everything he was taught about bioethics and proper, moral medical practice, which entirely rests upon informed consent. Everyone, he says, has the right to reject medical treatment.

I am only 17 minutes in, and cannot watch the whole thing right now. But Dr. Malone — whom if you have been following the subject* is almost certainly known to you — provides an important perspective on the current contagion and immediate over-reaction by governments and the karen class.

As all my friends know, I hazard that the current pandemic response is revolutionary: a psy-op, as well as an act of war by China and the elites against the American and world population. I also believe that . . . oh, well, you know what I suspect . . . that the new fascism has arrived, that Democrats are establishing it with lip-smacking glee at their new-found grip on power, and that all you who parrot the psy-op slogans (the CDC’s clever-but-evil assurance that the jabs are “Safe, effective, and free!”) are behaving like (and are the moral equivalent of) those Weimar Germans who saw hope in the chancellorship of You-Know-Who.


I hope I don’t understate things. I believe it is evil to promote universal vaccination with experimental technology whose utility is diminishing right before our eyes during the rollout.

If you spread the idea of universal vaccination, you are not merely wrong, you are morally wrong, and should stop. You don’t need to reject all vaccines or the idea of widespread use of some vaccines. You just need to look at the risks and look at standard Hippocratic practice to know that you are morally wrong to demand others “get the jab.”


Yesterday I shared on social media Richard Dolan’s excellent discussion of the current situation:

My only disagreement with Dolan is his underplaying of China’s role.

But be that as it may, we are now seeing the Therapeutic State, which Thomas Szasz warned about for decades — he saw its emergence in institutional psychiatry — come into its own as a totalitarian global order. The New World Order as prescribed by billionaires and Deep State operatives like George Herbert Walker Bush and “crazed futurists” is being established right now.

Dolan thinks there is hope, that we have time to stop it. I won’t be the one to dash that hope. For now.

twv

or, Why the Best Bioweapon Is a Weak Bioweapon

Early in the “pandemic,” Scott Adams heard a rumor that the new virus affected non-Chinese more fatally than the Chinese, so he speculated. If I remember correctly, his speculation was that a biological weapon directed against a race of people was an inevitability, and that perhaps it was happening now. Specifically, the Chinese “communists” harbored an itch to eradicate Uyghurs. Perhaps SARS-CoV-2 was a new instrument of that ongoing genocide, and it had gotten out of hand.

I do not follow Adams, and do not know how he ultimately settled, in his mind, this Ultimate Uyghur Sanction, but I was impressed by one thing: Adams was willing to consider wild possibilities, including one that most people resisted on what seemed like grounds of squeamishness, the squeamishness of people afraid to be called “racist,” or “conspiracy theorists”: that the virus was built in a lab, and may have even been deliberately deployed as a bioweapon.

More than a year and a half later, and now the likelihood of the so-called Lab Leak Theory is commonly recognized as quite high. The worm turned.

Early on, I advised that, according to the Precautionary Principle, it was pure foolishness not to consider the possibility of a conscious bioweapon release. The reason to parlay the principle was simple: one considers a danger to prevent the worst outcomes. Early on, the Precautionary Principle was used to justify extreme mitigation efforts. But that was considering only the virus as a menace. By considering its threat potential, on the other hand, we might fend off other possibilities — those worse than a mere mass death.

Worse?

Yes.

The trouble with bioweaponry is that its deployment is negative sum: it is almost impossible to contain a virus, and the virus you deploy against your enemy will likely bite back at you.

With China, though, there is plenty of “surplus population.” So if the virus’s creators had prepared an inoculation in advance, and were willing to get rid of some population surplus, while also destroying much more of their enemy populations, that remains a possible strategy.

But there is a simpler method. If you want to destroy your enemies, what you want is not a real killer virus, but a virus that is actually not that dangerous … but which, with the right propaganda also deployed, can be made to seem more dangerous than it is. Indeed, a weak bioweapon is the perfect kernel for a psychological operation to get one’s enemies to over-react and weaken themselves.

Which is what happened.

Not only have western nations — weakened by standard churning state politics and China-funded race-baiting psy-ops — over-reacted to the contagion with psychologically destabilizing mask mandates and economically and culturally destructive lockdowns against commerce, they now deploy a very risky set of pseudo-vaccines, which may end up killing more people than the disease they are supposed to defend against.

I don’t know much about what is actually happening, but I do know that it is easy to manipulate mass men. 

And that is what we have here, the culture of Late Stage Churning State Capitalism is filled with Last Men, the gender-rending fools of our decadent culture. Our politics is now crazy, our government policies crazier, and our culture, laziest, ready for Lying Flat, the ultimate nincompoopery of a witless, ill-informed, culture of marks.

Grifted by the authorities, we accept as true things that are obviously false.

What things? You know, things like notion that the pandemic was an existential threat. No. Our reaction to it was. Are we fulfilling a civilizational death wish, or have we been pushed by Chinese (or globalist?) machinations?

I suspect the latter, but don’t rule out the former. Conspiracies are possible, but invisible hand processes still dominate most major trends.

In any case, we must contemplate the possibility that the pandemic could be the result of a conspiratorial threat — of warfare — so we can steal ourselves against our own destruction. It is easier to unite in the face of a concerted threat than against a mysterious menace; easier to accept losses, easier to become heroes.

twv

“The blood clots are not rare”

It looks like Alex Jones is on to something big: “Deadly Blood Clots Develop In 62% of People Receiving COVID Vaccine” according to preliminary studies.

I of course know nothing.

But from the beginning, the rapid deployment of a very novel vaccine was being pushed through the regulatory system smelled suspicious. The fact that this new technology was rejected for flu vaccination purposes, and that many of the experimenters warned against this tech’s use on humans, suggested that extra caution was in order.

Extra caution against the cure.

Indeed, the novel coronavirus’s novel vaccines were developed too quickly to be believed. That is — if we can believe the official story. Which we cannot. This is old-enough tech, and there is a literature surrounding it. And if the skeptics in this video are to be trusted, the literature goes against the current vaxx-pushing policy. But that seems like common sense to me, it being imprudent to force a novel technology on the world population with so little public review.

And I mean public review, where scientists debate openly in public, without censorship. With censorship? Let others take the risk.

There has got to be a control group. Let the uncontrolled self-enroll. We all take our risks.

Dr. Charles Hoffe

In the video, Dr. Charles Hoffe, explains how the mRNA “vaccine’s” effects include microscopic clotting damage done to the brain, leading to many of the common symptoms, and similar damage to the lungs, inducing permanent “distorted architecture” (“increased reticulation”) that leads to “high blood pressure in their lungs” which, in three years, would likely lead to death by “right-sided heart failure.”

Sixty-two percent?

Talk about bad odds.

Dr. Hoffe has been removed of his ER duties because he has spoken out. That is a key fact, which helps you to know that we are dealing with a very dangerous madness of crowds and a possible manipulation of such madness by managerial elites, who know that their ability to control the masses is key to their own privileged status.

The second half of the video goes deep into conspiracy theory, where the idea is that our elites are engaging in a worldwide “eugenics” campaign to basically push Holodomor 2.0. I know nothing about that. Doesn’t seem impossible. The Depopulation Death Cult has been around for decades. I once sort of bought into it, back when I was an ignorant environmentalist. Viruses of the mind are more catching than actual viruses. Ideas have consequences.

“A worldwide contagion of a neurosis,” says one doctor. Yes. That much is obvious.

twv

The analytic mindset is geared towards monocausal explanations. Duo-causal and multi-causal explanations offend against the rule of thumb known as Occam’s razor. Even theories that technically incorporate many causes are usually framed as mono-causal. Example? The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle.

And it is fun to watch the schoolmen fight it out, so to speak, to see who can toe their chosen line with the most singular ferocity.

This is a huge problem for the UFO issue. Of the persistently unexplained aerial phenomena, I suspect that Deep State players are trying like heck to keep people thinking of One Explanation, and away from Many.

Some UFOs are no doubt poorly understood plasma phenomena; others are man-made craft of an “experimental” nature; still others are perhaps developed from wrecks from extraterrestrial civilizations’ excursions; others could be incursions from extraterrestrial elsewheres; there could be time-travelers and other interdimensionals (I place my bets heavily on this latter, alas); and crypto-terrestrial breakaway and remnant civilizations are I suppose possible.

The common lurch towards ET hypothesis is interesting. We should wonder to what extent our opinions on such matters have been sculpted not merely by science fiction, but by psy-ops behind sf, especially sf TV and movies.

Meanwhile, the debunkers’ “UFOs Are All Illusions” Theory seems untenable. I wish it were true, though. All of the possible explanations (listed causes), above, are uber-creepy.

As would be the religious folks’ go-to theory: “Angels and Demons.”

twv on Gab

The reason the analytic mindset exhibits a prejudice for mono-causal explanations should be obvious, but will nevertheless be explained at greater length in a future entry here, no doubt.